Book Reviews, Bookworm Blogging

Stardust [review]


Stardust by Neil Gaiman
Published by William Morrow & Company on December 31, 1999 (originally 1998)
my rating: ⭐️⭐️
Goodreads avg:

** Spoilers Ahead ** 

Goodreads | IndieBound | Author’s Website

Young Tristran Thorn has lost his heart to beautiful Victoria Forester. But Victoria is cold and distant–as distant, in fact, as the star she and Tristran see fall from the sky on a crisp October evening. For the coveted prize of Victoria’s hand, Tristran vows to retrieve the fallen star and deliver it to his beloved. It is an oath that sends the lovelorn swain over the ancient wall dividing the village from the adjacent meadow, and propels him into a world that is strange beyond imagining. But Tristran is not the only one seeking the heavenly jewel. There are those for whom it promises youth and beauty, the key to a kingdom, and the rejuvenation of dark dormant magics. And a lad compelled by love will have to keep his wits about him to succeed and survive in this secret place where fallen stars come in many guises–and where quests have a way of branching off in unexpected directions, even turning back upon themselves in space and in time.

Two stars always feels like such a negative rating, but it really just means I “didn’t like it.” This book could hover around a 2.5 for me, but I think 2 is slightly more accurate. I know Neil Gaiman is a beloved author and I have enjoyed several of his works (although, don’t get me started on Anansi Boys), but Stardust just wasn’t for me.

I didn’t care about Tristran and I hated that he was just an unremarkable boy who got remarkably lucky and saved the day and got the girl even though his plan until almost the end of the book was to essentially enslave her and give her as an offering to another beautiful girl that he covets (I wouldn’t call what he feels love).

Besides the star (who doesn’t really count as human) and perhaps Tristran’s biological mother, every woman in the story is made out to be either unimportant or awful. Victoria is the whole reason for Tristran’s quest, but only because she snubbed him and didn’t tell him she was engaged. He literally forgets about and could not care less about his adoptive mother and sister. And there are plenty of evil witches, as well as a female merchant who had enslaved Tristran’s mother.

Whew, I didn’t mean to rant like that, but it all just really got to me. On top of that, I just wasn’t a fan of the writing style in this one. There are parts of the story that I found intriguing, so it wasn’t all bad. And it is a quick read, very easy to get through. So all-in-all, if this sounds like your jam: go for it. It just definitely wasn’t mine.

Twitter | Goodreads
(Cover and blurb courtesy of Goodreads.)

11 thoughts on “Stardust [review]”

  1. Great review! This is one of those books that’s been on my vague “eventually” TBR forever, but I honestly doubt I’ll get around to any time soon, if ever. I’ve come to realize, now that I’m less inclined to FORCE myself to try and like popular authors (looking at you, Jane Austen), that I really don’t think Neil’s writing is for me. I did enjoy the beginning of Graveyard Book, which is more than I can say for the other books of his I’ve tried reading, but even GB wasn’t quite enough to make me actually finish it yet. :/

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thank you! I feel like Graveyard Book is also much different than most of his other works. That and Coraline feel like they’re written by a different author, for me at least. I definitely agree that you shouldn’t force yourself to try to like popular authors! I actually forgot until just now that I DNFed his more recent book of short stories. He’s definitely a hit or miss author for me.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you! I haven’t seen the film yet, but I think I will now that I’ve finished the book. I’m always intrigued to see how adaptations are, especially if it’s a book I didn’t love (because sometimes I actually enjoy the movie more!)

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I really love the movie based on this book, but I’d be surprised if I enjoyed the book based on the problems you had with it! I also wonder if I’d feel the same way about the movie if I revisited it. I feel like such problems are common enough in movies that I might notice it less!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yeah, that certainly makes sense! I think it’s easier to overlook in the book too because it’s written like an old-fashioned fairytale, and those tend to have a lot of tropes that are more sexist. I’m definitely going to check out the movie, just to see what it’s like!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s